Equipoise abandoned? Randomization and clinical trials.

نویسندگان

  • R Kurzrock
  • D J Stewart
چکیده

and exploring experience. Eur J Cancer Care 2002; 11: 161–165. 20. Edgar A. The expert patient: Illness as practice. Med Health Care Philos 2005; 8: 165–171. 21. Simonelli C, Annunziata MA, Chimienti E, Berretta M, Tirelli U. Cancer survivorship: a challenge for the European oncologists. Ann Oncol 2008; 7: 1216–1217. 22. Bellizzi KM, Blank TO. Cancer-related identity and positive affect in survivors of prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2007; 1: 44–48. 23. McCabe MS, Bhatia S, Oeffinger KC et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: achieving high-quality cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 2013 January 7 [Epub ahead of print], doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.6854. 24. Gubar S. Not a Cancer Survivor. New York Times Health Section, 6th September 2012. Available http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/06/not-a-cancer-survivor/ (8 March 2013, date last accessed). 25. Frank AW. The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1995. 26. Feuerstein M. Defining cancer survivorship. J Cancer Surviv 2007; 1: 5–7. 27. Doyle N. Cancer survivorship: evolutionary concept analysis. JOAN 2008; 62: 499–509. 28. Aziz NM, Rowland JH. Trends and advances in cancer survivorship research: challenge and opportunity. Semin Radiat Oncol 2003; 13: 248–266. 29. Mack JW, Smith TJ. Reasons why physicians do not have discussions about poor prognosis, why it matters, and what can be improved. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 2715–2717. 30. Smith TJ, Longo DL. Talking with patients about dying. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1651–1652. 31. Smith TJ, Temin S, Alesi ER et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: the integration of palliative care into standard oncology care. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 880–887. 32. Surbone A, Rajer M, Stiefel R et al. (eds) New Challenges in Communication with Cancer Patients. New York, NY: Springer 2012. 33. Yu B. A minimum version of log-rank test for testing the existence of cancer care using relative survival data. Biometrical J 2012; 54: 45–60. 34. Earle CC, Ganz PA. Cancer survivorship care: don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 3764–3768. 35. Schapira L. Shared uncertainty. J Support Oncol 2004; 2: 14, 18.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials.

A predominant ethical view holds that physician-investigators should conduct their research with therapeutic intent. And since a physician offering a therapy wouldn't prescribe second-rate treatments, the experimental intervention and the best proven therapy should appear equally effective. "Clinical equipoise" is necessary. But this perspective is flawed. The ethics of research and of therapy ...

متن کامل

Equipoise and the ethics of randomization.

It is widely accepted that randomized controlled clinical trials yield the most reliable evidence about the effects of clinical carel. In this article we discuss the ethical importance of 'equipoise'-the condition which applies when there is no preference between the treatment options to be compared. We ask whether equipoise is an essential prerequisite for an ethical trial: are trials ethical ...

متن کامل

The intellectual challenges and emotional consequences of equipoise contributed to the fragility of recruitment in six randomized controlled trials☆

OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to investigate how doctors considered and experienced the concept of equipoise while recruiting patients to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING In-depth interviews with 32 doctors in six publicly funded pragmatic RCTs explored their perceptions of equipoise as they undertook RCT recruitment. The RCTs varied in size, duration, type o...

متن کامل

The paradox of equipoise: the principle that drives and limits therapeutic discoveries in clinical research.

BACKGROUND Progress in clinical medicine relies on the willingness of patients to take part in experimental clinical trials, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Before agreeing to enroll in clinical trials, patients require guarantees that they will not knowingly be harmed and will have the best possible chances of receiving the most favorable treatments. This guarantee is provide...

متن کامل

Equipoise in Clinical Trials

“Do you have equipoise?” The question was simple, yet loaded with challenges. We were being invited to participate in a prospective randomized controlled phase 3 trial testing whether acute endovascular stroke therapy can be beneficial for patients presenting beyond 6 hours from symptom onset (≤6 hours is the currently accepted therapeutic time window for mechanical thrombectomy) when using per...

متن کامل

Quality of Randomization in Clinical Trials Published in Persian Journals of Medical Sciences Indexed in Scopus during 2013-2017

Background and Objectives: Randomization is one of the principles of correct clinical trial. The aim of this study was to determine the quality of randomization in the published articles of clinical trials in the Persian-language journals indexed in Scopus.  ed in Scopus D Methods: In this cross-sectional study, all clinical trials published in Persian journals indexed in Scopus during 2013-2...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology

دوره 24 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013